Insights / 法律观察
Case Highlight|Attorney Deng’s team represented a Chinese enterprise in Clorox’s patent infringement case, restoring Amazon listings at zero settlement cost.
Counsel of Record
Hongchang Deng · 邓宏昌
美国(加州)执业律师(Bar #354529)· USPTO · 中国专利代理师
Published
2026-02-03 · 6 min read

TL;DR
Recently, a client’s product listed for sale on Amazon US was removed from the platform on the grounds of alleged infringement of an invention patent owned by Clorox, a world-renowned brand. The client immediately contacted Attorney Deng, e
Recently, a client’s product listed for sale on Amazon US was removed from the platform on the grounds of alleged infringement of an invention patent owned by Clorox, a world-renowned brand. The client immediately contacted Attorney Deng, entrusting his team to analyze whether the product constituted patent infringement, and to negotiate on the client’s behalf with Clorox regarding potential settlement and patent licensing arrangements.
After reviewing the details of the case, Attorney Deng’s team promptly conducted a thorough analysis of the client’s product against the claim terms of Clorox’s patent. Following an in-depth comparison, the team found that the client’s product did not fall within the scope of the asserted claims and thus did not constitute an infringement.
Based on this conclusion, Attorney Deng immediately sent a non-infringement legal opinion letter to Clorox’s intellectual property and legal departments, demanding the immediate withdrawal of the complaint.
During the negotiation and communication process, Attorney Deng adopted a more proactive communication strategy in light of the potential litigation procedures. This strategy yielded excellent results.
The rights holder replied to the email on the very day of being contacted by Attorney Deng. After multiple rounds of communication, it acknowledged that the product indeed did not infringe on its patent on the following day. Eventually, the complaint was withdrawn promptly without any settlement costs, and the client’s Amazon listing was restored immediately. This prevented the client from suffering irreversible losses caused by the delisting during Black Friday and the year-end shopping sprees.
The swift and successful resolution of this case also highlights that Attorney Deng’s team has extensive successful experience in handling dispute resolution and negotiations pertaining to U.S. invention patent infringement matters.
When addressing the patent infringement dispute in this case, the team provided professional and accurate infringement assessment for the client’s product, delivered highly efficient responses and achieved results that exceeded the client’s expectations.
This case summary is provided for informational purposes only. Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes in future matters.
承办律师 / Counsel of Record
LawMay P.C.(美国路迈律师事务所)作为本案承办律所,由邓宏昌律师(Hongchang “Richard” Deng,CA Bar No. 354529)主持代理本案全程诉讼程序。
Partner · LawMay P.C.
邓律师主要从事中国及美国商品及服务争议解决,以及专利、商标、版权、商业秘密等涉外知识产权诉讼与无效确权业务,并办理中美商标申请及中国专利申请。常年服务跨境工贸企业、跨境电商、电子烟行业、科技制造业等领域,为财富 500 强、国际连锁品牌、出海科技品牌等多家中外知名企业提供常年及专项法律服务。
在跨境电商争议领域,邓律师专注 Schedule A 批量诉讼的被告应对,包括临时限制令(TRO)项下的店铺账户与资金解冻、通过确认不侵权之诉(Declaratory Judgment,DJ)与「反向 TRO」动议争取恢复被下架的商品链接与店铺经营,以及亚马逊账户冻结申诉、品牌备案(Brand Registry)争议等平台纠纷的代理。在华盛顿州西区联邦法院,邓律师代理多起确认不侵权之诉(DJ),取得了恢复商品上架、并禁止对方继续投诉的「反向 TRO」与「反向初步禁令(反向 PI)」。他熟悉 Schedule A 案件高发的伊利诺伊州北区、佛州南区等联邦法院的程序节奏,能在中美时差下迅速响应、把握应诉与和解的时间窗口。
在涉外电子烟与 FDA 监管领域,邓律师为电子烟及新型烟草企业提供覆盖确权、合规到维权的全流程代理,涵盖行业知识产权维权与 337 调查、PMTA 上市前申请与 STN 状态争议、FDA 执法防御(警告信、营销拒绝令 MDO、进口扣留 Import Alert),以及美国海关(CBP)清关合规与扣押货物申诉。
他代理的知识产权相关案件多次荣获「广东省知识产权行政保护典型案例」「广东省商业秘密保护大事件」、「深圳律师承办知识产权十大典型案例」、「深圳市侵害商业秘密典型案例」、「深圳律师国际贸易、投资领域典型案例」、「广东知识产权保护协会年度知识产权推荐学习案例」等专业荣誉。
他代理的商品及服务贸易纠纷、知识产权等争议解决案件涉案标的额总计达数十亿元人民币。
美国联邦知识产权诉讼 · 跨境工贸与电商争议 · 电子烟与 FDA 监管 · 商业秘密与不正当竞争
About LawMay P.C.
美国 LawMay 律师事务所
深耕中美跨境争议解决的美国精品律所。专注于美国联邦知识产权诉讼、337 调查、产品责任纠纷及重大商事争议。
Law May, We May.