Cross-Border Legal Counsel

LAWMAY P.C.

A U.S. boutique cross-border IP & litigation firm

Cross-Border IP & Enforcement.

Cross-Border Compliance Litigation.

FDA Regulatory Matters.

Product Liability Defense.

Across Our AttorneysCA · NY · WA State Bars·PRC Lawyers · PRC Patent Attorneys·USPTO Trademark Attorneys·Multi-State Federal Courts

Bar admissions vary by attorney — see individual profiles.

Insights

By the Numbers

100+Cases Handled

100+Clients Served

10+States · Federal Courts

6Practice Areas

For Amazon Sellers

Amazon Trademark & Brand Protection

U.S. trademark search & filing, USPTO prosecution, and Brand Registry enablement — end to end, with protection before final registration.

Explore the service

Why LawMay

Four Reasons Clients Don’t Leave

Bilingual Working Practice

We practice on both sides of the Pacific and work natively in English and Chinese — from the first client call to the federal courtroom, with no translation loss and no cultural mismatch. Your facts and your position reach the judge intact.

Federal Litigation

Schedule A mass litigation, emergency TRO dissolution, ITC Section 337 — the toughest federal battlegrounds for cross-border sellers are where we appear routinely, not occasionally.

Dual US–China Qualification

California, New York, and Washington attorneys; USPTO trademark attorneys; PRC lawyers and patent attorneys — one team holding both U.S. and Chinese credentials, so cross-border matters never get handed off between two sets of lawyers.

Deep, Not Wide

We are not a do-everything firm. We go deep in cross-border IP and dispute resolution, and nothing else. In high-stakes matters, the certainty of specialization beats the comfort of big-and-broad.

Practice Areas

Six Practice AreasThree urgent core + three supporting

Core Practice

Cross-Border E-Commerce

Schedule A defense, TRO dissolution, Amazon account freezes, and DJ + reverse TRO to force relisting. 24-hour response across US–China time zones.

Focus

Schedule A defense & asset release

TRO / DJ + reverse TRO strategy

Amazon account freeze & listing recovery

Authorities
15 U.S.C. § 1114 · 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d) · 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)

View Area

Product Liability

Full-cycle defense for Chinese manufacturers sued in product liability; recall compliance; insurance subrogation.

Focus

Full-cycle product liability defense

Product recall & CPSC compliance

Insurance subrogation

Authorities
15 U.S.C. § 2064 · 15 U.S.C. § 2064(b) · 16 C.F.R. Part 1115

View Area

Vape Industry & FDA Regulatory

Vape-industry IP enforcement, PMTA filings, STN status disputes, FDA enforcement defense, flavored-product authorization, and customs compliance.

Focus

PMTA filings & STN status disputes

FDA enforcement defense (warning letters / MDO / Import Alert)

Customs compliance & detention appeals

Authorities
21 U.S.C. § 387j · 21 U.S.C. § 387j(a)(2) · 21 U.S.C. § 387j(c)(2)(A)

View Area

Supporting Practice

Trademark

USPTO trademark registration, opposition, and cancellation; TTAB proceedings; Madrid international filing.

Focus

USPTO registration · opposition · cancellation

TTAB proceedings

Madrid international filing

Authorities
15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. · 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d) · 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)

View Area

Patent Litigation

Federal patent infringement litigation and defense, declaratory judgment (DJ) of non-infringement, patent invalidity litigation, and Federal Circuit (CAFC) appeals.

Focus

Patent infringement litigation & Schedule A defense

Declaratory judgment (DJ) of non-infringement

Patent invalidity litigation

Federal Circuit (CAFC) appeals

Authorities
35 U.S.C. § 271 · 35 U.S.C. § 282(a) · 35 U.S.C. § 102

View Area

Section 337 & Federal Litigation

ITC Section 337 investigation defense, CIT tariff and anti-circumvention litigation, and integrated federal district court patent & trademark litigation.

Focus

ITC Section 337 investigation defense

CIT tariff / anti-circumvention litigation

Federal district court patent & trademark litigation

Authorities
19 U.S.C. § 1337 · 19 U.S.C. § 1337(d) · 19 U.S.C. § 1337(f)

View Area

Representative Matters

Representative Matters & Track Record

Engagements drawn from public federal court records and client-authorized disclosures; select matters are anonymized to protect client confidences.

See All Matters

CaptionForum · DocketResult

Joint defense of ten defendants · Copyright infringement

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, S.D. Fla.

2026

After five months of full discovery, pretrial motions, and trial, the court ruled from the bench before the close of the first trial day that the defendants bore no liability; the plaintiff’s multi-million-dollar damages claims were denied in full.

Cross-border e-commerce seller · DJ + reverse TRO

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, D. Del.

2026

We moved for a “reverse” TRO on the client’s behalf; the court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint, and the client resumed store operations.

Cross-border e-commerce seller · Design-patent Schedule A

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, W.D. Pa.

2026

Filed and served a motion to dissolve the TRO and an opposition to the PI within three days; the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed before the motion was heard — seven days from engagement to dismissal.

Cross-border e-commerce seller · Utility-patent Schedule A

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, N.D. Ill.

2026

Stepped in quickly amid an account freeze; after the motion to dissolve the TRO was served, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed, the TRO was lifted, and the account was restored — ten days from engagement to dismissal.

U.S. Amazon seller · DJ action (non-infringement + patent invalidity)

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash.

2025

On preliminary patent-invalidity grounds, the court granted a TRO and PI, helping the client restore high-value listings on the eve of the Black Friday season.

Cross-border e-commerce seller · pre–Prime Day TRO dissolution + counterclaim

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, E.D. Tex.

2025

Dissolved the TRO on the eve of Prime Day and restored the listings; filed a counterclaim and a motion to recover damages, ultimately securing a settlement satisfactory to the client.

U.S. Amazon seller · vacating a TRO default judgment

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court

2025

Promptly moved to vacate a procedurally defective TRO default judgment and recovered the six-figure default amount that had been withdrawn.

U.S. vape company · California Proposition 65 class action

Product Liability

U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.

2025

Through key motions — motion to dismiss, motion to strike, and motion for clarification — secured a settlement satisfactory to the client on the eve of the hearing, resolving the matter efficiently and at low cost.

The Meaning of LawMay

Law May, We May.

At every moment of hardship — or the search for a breakthrough —
trust in the possibility that the law can promise.

LawMay stands beside you through every turning point,
to pursue and realize that possibility — and to break through, together.

LawMay P.C.

About the Firm →

News & Insights

Latest Insights

See All Insights

LawMay

业绩｜LawMay成功争取到判罚对方合理律师费

美国东部时间2026年5月20日，美国佛罗里达州南区联邦法院签发命令，裁定某知识产权权利人向LawMay代理的十名跨境电商卖家支付数千美金律师费。

24 days ago·2 min read

LawMay

业绩｜LawMay通过Motion to Enforce Settlement促使原告更正撤案并顺利完成亚马逊ASIN解封

近日，LawMay律师代理某跨境电商卖家，在一起美国联邦法院知识产权诉讼和解后，成功推动原告更正撤案文件，并进一步联系亚马逊解除具体ASIN限制，帮助客户恢复库存调用和产品销售。

24 days ago·2 min read

LawMay

美国第七巡回法院：Schedule A案件对中国卖家"电邮送达"不符合海牙公约

2026年5月29日，美国联邦第七巡回上诉法院发布了一份值得跨境电商卖家关注的判决。对于曾在美国Schedule A诉讼中被起诉、店铺链接被冻结，或账户资金被划扣的中国卖家而言，该判决可能具有重要的实务意义。

24 days ago·5 min read

The Team

A Bilingual US–China Team

Our attorneys are qualified across the U.S. (CA Bar · USPTO trademark attorneys) and China (PRC lawyers · patent attorneys) — fluent in both languages and both legal systems, with seamless handoff between them.