Cross-Border Legal Counsel

LAWMAY P.C.

A U.S. boutique cross-border IP & litigation firm

Cross-Border IP & Enforcement.

Cross-Border Compliance Litigation.

FDA Regulatory Matters.

Product Liability Defense.

Across Our AttorneysCA · NY · WA State Bars·PRC Lawyers · PRC Patent Attorneys·USPTO Trademark Attorneys·Multi-State Federal Courts

Bar admissions vary by attorney — see individual profiles.

Insights

By the Numbers

0+Cases Handled

0+Clients Served

0+States · Federal Courts

0Practice Areas

For Amazon Sellers

Amazon Trademark & Brand Protection

U.S. trademark search & filing, USPTO prosecution, and Brand Registry enablement — end to end, with protection before final registration.

Explore the service

Why LawMay

Four Reasons Clients Don’t Leave

Bilingual Working Practice

We practice on both sides of the Pacific and work natively in English and Chinese — from the first client call to the federal courtroom, with no translation loss and no cultural mismatch. Your facts and your position reach the judge intact.

Federal Litigation

Schedule A mass litigation, emergency TRO dissolution, ITC Section 337 — the toughest federal battlegrounds for cross-border sellers are where we appear routinely, not occasionally.

Dual US–China Qualification

California, New York, and Washington attorneys; USPTO trademark attorneys; PRC lawyers and patent attorneys — one team holding both U.S. and Chinese credentials, so cross-border matters never get handed off between two sets of lawyers.

Deep, Not Wide

We are not a do-everything firm. We go deep in cross-border IP and dispute resolution, and nothing else. In high-stakes matters, the certainty of specialization beats the comfort of big-and-broad.

Practice Areas

Six Practice AreasThree urgent core + three supporting

Core Practice

Cross-Border E-Commerce

Schedule A defense, TRO dissolution, Amazon account freezes, and DJ + reverse TRO to force relisting. 24-hour response across US–China time zones.

Focus

Schedule A defense & asset release

TRO / DJ + reverse TRO strategy

Amazon account freeze & listing recovery

View Area

Product Liability

Full-cycle defense for Chinese manufacturers sued in product liability; recall compliance; insurance subrogation.

Focus

Full-cycle product liability defense

Product recall & CPSC compliance

Insurance subrogation

View Area

Vape Industry & FDA Regulatory

Vape-industry IP enforcement, PMTA filings, STN status disputes, FDA enforcement defense, flavored-product authorization, and customs compliance.

Focus

PMTA filings & STN status disputes

FDA enforcement defense (warning letters / MDO / Import Alert)

Customs compliance & detention appeals

View Area

Supporting Practice

Trademark

USPTO trademark registration, opposition, and cancellation; TTAB proceedings; Madrid international filing.

Focus

USPTO registration · opposition · cancellation

TTAB proceedings

Madrid international filing

View Area

Patent Litigation

Federal patent infringement litigation and defense, declaratory judgment (DJ) of non-infringement, patent invalidity litigation, and Federal Circuit (CAFC) appeals.

Focus

Patent infringement litigation & Schedule A defense

Declaratory judgment (DJ) of non-infringement

Patent invalidity litigation

Federal Circuit (CAFC) appeals

View Area

Section 337 & Federal Litigation

ITC Section 337 investigation defense, CIT tariff and anti-circumvention litigation, and integrated federal district court patent & trademark litigation.

Focus

ITC Section 337 investigation defense

CIT tariff / anti-circumvention litigation

Federal district court patent & trademark litigation

View Area

Representative Matters

Representative Matters & Track Record

Engagements drawn from public federal court records and client-authorized disclosures; select matters are anonymized to protect client confidences.

See All Matters

CaptionForum · DocketResult

Joint defense of ten defendants · Copyright infringement

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, S.D. Fla.

2026

After five months of full discovery, pretrial motions, and trial, the court ruled from the bench before the close of the first trial day that the defendants bore no liability; the plaintiff’s multi-million-dollar damages claims were denied in full.

Cross-border e-commerce seller · DJ + reverse TRO

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, D. Del.

2026

We moved for a “reverse” TRO on the client’s behalf; the court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint, and the client resumed store operations.

Cross-border e-commerce seller · Design-patent Schedule A

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, W.D. Pa.

2026

Filed and served a motion to dissolve the TRO and an opposition to the PI within three days; the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed before the motion was heard — seven days from engagement to dismissal.

Cross-border e-commerce seller · Utility-patent Schedule A

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, N.D. Ill.

2026

Stepped in quickly amid an account freeze; after the motion to dissolve the TRO was served, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed, the TRO was lifted, and the account was restored — ten days from engagement to dismissal.

U.S. Amazon seller · DJ action (non-infringement + patent invalidity)

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash.

2025

On preliminary patent-invalidity grounds, the court granted a TRO and PI, helping the client restore high-value listings on the eve of the Black Friday season.

Cross-border e-commerce seller · pre–Prime Day TRO dissolution + counterclaim

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court, E.D. Tex.

2025

Dissolved the TRO on the eve of Prime Day and restored the listings; filed a counterclaim and a motion to recover damages, ultimately securing a settlement satisfactory to the client.

U.S. Amazon seller · vacating a TRO default judgment

Cross-Border E-Commerce

U.S. District Court

2025

Promptly moved to vacate a procedurally defective TRO default judgment and recovered the six-figure default amount that had been withdrawn.

U.S. vape company · California Proposition 65 class action

Product Liability

U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.

2025

Through key motions — motion to dismiss, motion to strike, and motion for clarification — secured a settlement satisfactory to the client on the eve of the hearing, resolving the matter efficiently and at low cost.

The Meaning of LawMay

Law May, We May.

At every moment of hardship — or the search for a breakthrough —
trust in the possibility that the law can promise.

LawMay stands beside you through every turning point,
to pursue and realize that possibility — and to break through, together.

LawMay P.C.

About the Firm →

News & Insights

Latest Insights

See All Insights

FDA新政解读：调味电子烟首获授权与执法宽限政策的双重信号

2026年5月5日与5月8日，美国FDA连续发布两项对电子烟行业有重大影响的决定，监管立场上的“开口”与“收紧”同步释放，值得每一家出口美国的中国电子烟企业高度关注。一、FDA两项新政速览5月5日：调味电子烟“零的突破”FDA通过PMTA（上市前烟草产品申请）路径授权了Glas公司4款封闭式烟弹（含5%烟碱）： • Classic Menthol（经典薄荷） • Fresh Menthol（清新薄荷） • Gold（芒果味） • Sapphire（蓝莓味）其中Gold和Sa

2026-05-15·9 min read

LawMay举行2026年5月内部分享会

近日，LawMay举行2026年5月内部分享会。会议围绕美国知识产权诉讼、跨境电商平台争议、商标业务、案件管理、法律写作规范以及AI工具在法律实务中的应用等议题展开。过去一年，LawMay团队处理了近百宗美国案件，其中绝大部分涉及到美国知识产权联邦诉讼及产品责任纠纷相关。涵盖专利、商标、版权及跨境电商平台相关争议。除联邦法院诉讼外，团队亦持续处理跨境电商平台争议、商标申请及审查意见答复、版权与专利相关事务等业务。随着案件数量、项目类型和协作强度持续提升，团队在本次分享会中重点

2026-05-15·6 min read

AI模仿他人声音，侵权边界在哪？从谷歌案看懂声音法律保护逻辑

声音是自然人独有的身份标识，不仅与个体的人格尊严紧密相连，也具备越来越高的商业价值。随着AI语音合成、声音克隆技术普及，未经许可模仿他人声音进行商业使用，已成为高频法律争议。2026年1月，美国国家公共广播电台（NPR）资深主持人David Greene正式向加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉县高等法院提起对谷歌（Google）的诉讼，指控谷歌旗下的人工智能产品NotebookLM（其中包含声称播客的功能）未经其许可，模仿他具有辨识度的声音特征，包括节奏（cadence）、音调（tone）

2026-05-15·9 min read

The Team

A Bilingual US–China Team

Our attorneys are qualified across the U.S. (CA Bar · USPTO trademark attorneys) and China (PRC lawyers · patent attorneys) — fluent in both languages and both legal systems, with seamless handoff between them.