
LawMay一周内快速反制美国发明专利亚马逊投诉,通过DJ诉讼成功促成权利人撤回投诉并恢复产品上架
跨境卖家在亚马逊遭遇美国发明专利投诉、产品链接被下架时,能否主动反制?2026 年 8 月,LawMay P.C.(美国路迈律师事务所)代理某跨境卖家,就其喂食器产品遭受的发明专利投诉,在美国伊利诺伊北区联邦地区法院提起确认之诉(DJ 诉讼),主张不侵权、专利无效及不可执行,并在提交反向 TRO 动
Cross-Border Legal Counsel
A U.S. boutique cross-border IP & litigation firm
Cross-Border IP & Enforcement.
Cross-Border Compliance Litigation.
FDA Regulatory Matters.
Product Liability Defense.
Bar admissions vary by attorney — see individual profiles.
By the Numbers
For Amazon Sellers
U.S. trademark search & filing, USPTO prosecution, and Brand Registry enablement — end to end, with protection before final registration.
Why LawMay
01
We practice on both sides of the Pacific and work natively in English and Chinese — from the first client call to the federal courtroom, with no translation loss and no cultural mismatch. Your facts and your position reach the judge intact.
02
Schedule A mass litigation, emergency TRO dissolution, ITC Section 337 — the toughest federal battlegrounds for cross-border sellers are where we appear routinely, not occasionally.
03
California, New York, and Washington attorneys; USPTO trademark attorneys; PRC lawyers and patent attorneys — one team holding both U.S. and Chinese credentials, so cross-border matters never get handed off between two sets of lawyers.
04
We are not a do-everything firm. We go deep in cross-border IP and dispute resolution, and nothing else. In high-stakes matters, the certainty of specialization beats the comfort of big-and-broad.
Practice Areas
Core Practice
Schedule A defense, TRO dissolution, Amazon account freezes, and DJ + reverse TRO to force relisting. 24-hour response across US–China time zones.
Focus
Authorities
15 U.S.C. § 1114 · 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d) · 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)
View Area
Full-cycle defense for Chinese manufacturers sued in product liability; recall compliance; insurance subrogation.
Focus
Authorities
15 U.S.C. § 2064 · 15 U.S.C. § 2064(b) · 16 C.F.R. Part 1115
View Area
Vape-industry IP enforcement, PMTA filings, STN status disputes, FDA enforcement defense, flavored-product authorization, and customs compliance.
Focus
Authorities
21 U.S.C. § 387j · 21 U.S.C. § 387j(a)(2) · 21 U.S.C. § 387j(c)(2)(A)
View Area
Supporting Practice
USPTO trademark registration, opposition, and cancellation; TTAB proceedings; Madrid international filing.
Focus
Authorities
15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. · 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d) · 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)
View Area
Federal patent infringement litigation and defense, declaratory judgment (DJ) of non-infringement, patent invalidity litigation, and Federal Circuit (CAFC) appeals.
Focus
Authorities
35 U.S.C. § 271 · 35 U.S.C. § 282(a) · 35 U.S.C. § 102
View Area
ITC Section 337 investigation defense, CIT tariff and anti-circumvention litigation, and integrated federal district court patent & trademark litigation.
Focus
Authorities
19 U.S.C. § 1337 · 19 U.S.C. § 1337(d) · 19 U.S.C. § 1337(f)
View Area
Representative Matters
Engagements drawn from public federal court records and client-authorized disclosures; select matters are anonymized to protect client confidences.
Joint defense of ten defendants · Copyright infringement
Cross-Border E-Commerce
U.S. District Court, S.D. Fla.
2026
Cross-border e-commerce seller · DJ + reverse TRO
Cross-Border E-Commerce
U.S. District Court, D. Del.
2026
Cross-border e-commerce seller · Design-patent Schedule A
Cross-Border E-Commerce
U.S. District Court, W.D. Pa.
2026
Cross-border e-commerce seller · Utility-patent Schedule A
Cross-Border E-Commerce
U.S. District Court, N.D. Ill.
2026
U.S. Amazon seller · DJ action (non-infringement + patent invalidity)
Cross-Border E-Commerce
U.S. District Court, W.D. Wash.
2025
Cross-border e-commerce seller · pre–Prime Day TRO dissolution + counterclaim
Cross-Border E-Commerce
U.S. District Court, E.D. Tex.
2025
U.S. Amazon seller · vacating a TRO default judgment
Cross-Border E-Commerce
U.S. District Court
2025
U.S. vape company · California Proposition 65 class action
Product Liability
U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.
2025
The Meaning of LawMay
At every moment of hardship — or the search for a breakthrough —
trust in the possibility that the law can promise.
LawMay stands beside you through every turning point,
to pursue and realize that possibility — and to break through, together.
News & Insights

跨境卖家在亚马逊遭遇美国发明专利投诉、产品链接被下架时,能否主动反制?2026 年 8 月,LawMay P.C.(美国路迈律师事务所)代理某跨境卖家,就其喂食器产品遭受的发明专利投诉,在美国伊利诺伊北区联邦地区法院提起确认之诉(DJ 诉讼),主张不侵权、专利无效及不可执行,并在提交反向 TRO 动

在美国专利诉讼中,被告提出专利无效反诉时,需要具体到什么程度才能通过 Rule 12(b)(6) 的诉状审查?2026 年 8 月 10 日,美国伊利诺伊北区联邦地区法院在 LawMay P.C.(美国路迈律师事务所)代理的一起发明专利诉讼中,完整驳回了专利权人针对无效反诉提出的第二次驳回动议。

在美国知识产权诉讼中,“缺席”并不是一个单一状态。被告可能只是被录入缺席状态,也可能已经被法院下达缺席判决,甚至判决已经进入执行阶段。不同阶段适用的规则、撤销标准和处理空间都不一样。
The Team
Our attorneys are qualified across the U.S. (CA Bar · USPTO trademark attorneys) and China (PRC lawyers · patent attorneys) — fluent in both languages and both legal systems, with seamless handoff between them.
Richard Deng
Hongchang Deng
Partner
View Bio
Yi Yi
Non-Equity Partner
View Bio
Peter Li
Non-Equity Partner
View Bio
Claire Wu
Non-Equity Partner
View Bio
Yunyun Liu
Of Counsel
View Bio
Gigi Wu
Of Counsel
View Bio
Kim Zhang
Of Counsel
View Bio
Ming Liu
Of Counsel
View Bio
Iliyaas Mallard
Professional Development Advisor
View Bio
9-person cross-border team · IP / Litigation / FDA